เข้าสู่ระบบ JOKER
หน้าหลัก ไม่มีหมวดหมู่
193 views
MAPO – MAPOLE – MAPONA – MAPOTI – MAPOU – MAPPA – MAPPCP – MAPPING – MAPPP 367 U.S. 643 (1961) stated that illegally obtained evidence could not be presented in state court to support criminal charges against the accused. The Court relied on the earlier decision in Weeks v. United States, 222 U.S. 383 (1914). Weeks introduced the exclusion rule, which states that a person whose Fourth Amendment protection against improper search and seizure has been violated has the right to exclude any evidence obtained in this manner from use in court. In Mapp, the Court held that the exclusionary rule was universally applicable to all criminal proceedings, reversing the judgment in Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949), in so far as it did not comply with the exclusionary rule applicable to State judicial proceedings and thus considerably extended the constitutional protection of the accused. In United States v. Leon, 468 USA 897 (1984), the Court upheld an exception to the exclusion rule and held that evidence obtained “in good faith” with a search warrant later found invalid remained admissible, with the unacceptable social costs of excluding such evidence being central to the decision. Mobilize for action through partnership and planning of multidimensional dependencies and personality profiles.
Last Update : 16 พฤศจิกายน 2022